Re: Imap SSL support (Bug #10330)

From: Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 09:33:41 +0000
Subject: Re: Imap SSL support (Bug #10330)
References: 1 2  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-53551@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 11:19:10AM +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote: > On Thu, 3 May 2001, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > > >> IMAP-2001.beta doesn't work but it doesn't even matter as it still is > >> _beta_. > >As original author already pointed out, error triggers out with IMAP > >2000*, not with IMAP 2001 betas. And I'm saying about it too. With > > Please read that bug report. It only talks about IMAP-2001. > And IMAP-2000 works fine. I just compiled it and PHP compiles with it just > fine. > > >IMAP-2000 ext/imap does not compiles well using phpize because both > >PHP_ARG_WITH() in its config.m4. > > Why would anyone want to use phpize on imap extension? > (forgive me but I never have needed phpize..) It is absolutly needed for distribution purposes. It is generally strange to compile in, f.e. IMAP extension, into main PHP binary and make it available in Linux distribution because it implies additional unneeded dependencies. That's why almost all extensions like IMAP, MySQL, PGSQL, sockets, GD, PDF, etc could and should be compiled out of PHP4 source. This also includes more manageable RPM or DEB specs. Imagine build of 15-20 packages from one source RPM. For example, in our ALT Linux distribution we are packaging 18 PHP4 extensions including PHP-GTK which specifically designed to be build as SCE. -- Sincerely yours, Alexander Bokovoy The Midgard Project | ALT Linux Team | Minsk Linux Users Group www.midgard-project.org | www.altlinux.ru | www.minsk-lug.net -- You won't skid if you stay in a rut. -- Frank Hubbard

« previous php.dev (#53551) next »