Re: Release process

[Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com>] > At 05:52 AM 5/3/2001 -0400, Stig Sæther Bakken wrote: > >We'll always have the problem of "I need to MFH this, pretty please", > >but I think that started working well at the end of the 4.0.5 QA. :-) > > I actually also think that on a whole 4.0.5's release process was > pretty good and a big improvement on anything we had in the past. > That brings me to more current events. I'd like to roll an RC1 for > 4.0.6 pretty soon (Saturday?). > I think the only fix which really needs to make it in (unless I forgot > something) is the libtool detection patch. So we'll use a codename for it that will the third noun on page 5 of sunday's morning paper in Trondheim (as was agreed by lack of protest a few weeks ago ;-). - Stig -- Stig Sæther Bakken <ssb@fast.no> Fast Search & Transfer ASA, Trondheim, Norway