Re: unbuffered mysql_db_query for 4.0.6?

*sigh* Nevermind. Let's keep bloating. --Jani On Thu, 10 May 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote: >At 14:39 10/5/2001, Jani Taskinen wrote: >>On Thu, 10 May 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote: >> >> >What does that mean that it takes 'too long', though. Too long for >> >what? I don't see any strong reason to nuke it at all, definitely not in >> >the near future. >> >Remember people, there are millions of users out there who don't appreciate >> >us at all for every downwards-compatibility break that we make, and for a >> >good reason. >> >>Hmm..I haven't seen millions of emails about ANY downwards-compatibility >>break. I haven't seen ANY emails about them. So where do they send them? > >The big ones don't send emails. They simply don't upgrade, and they're >very sour about being forced to stay behind, in terms of functionality, >stability and security, because we break compatibility. I personally >talked to dozens of those. > >>If you tell in e.g. NEWS file "This version will break this and that" >>why would anyone get pissed? They had been warned. Let them use the old >>versions then. > >Just a simple example, there are dozens more - consider an ISP that has a >few dozen different sites hosted on his server. Can you even begin to >imagine the mess it is to upgrade his server to a version that breaks >downwards compatibility? > >Zeev > > >-- >Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> >CTO & co-founder, Zend Technologies Ltd. >http://www.zend.com/ > > >