Re: NGScan - technical explanation

From: Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 18:48:35 +0000
Subject: Re: NGScan - technical explanation
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-59391@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 09:43:43PM +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 21:38 9/7/2001, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
> >    as long as the (perception of the) Zend License stopps him
> >    from submitting it to the ZendEngine he has no other choice
> >    than to put it somewhere where he feels comfortable with it.
> 
> Yes, but if he puts it in PHP, it also has to be comfortable with other 
> people.  I'm pretty uncomfortable with this structural mess.

    you cut a few lines of my mail that were important: i could
    see a need for a non-QPL scanner.

> 
> >    besides that i can actually think of one or two usages for
> >    a scanner in PHP which is not QPL. for exacle that reason the
> >    your DOMXML sample is void - if we had a better DOMXML under
> >    the same license we would use the better one.
> 
> Can you share your thoughts as to how exactly GPL scanner built into PHP in 
> an odd way would improve your world for the better?  Remember, the scanner 
> is already there, you can use it if you think it's useful.  We're arguing 
> on whether it should be plugged into PHP in a backwards way or not.

    the current sources say it's under the PHP-License.

    tc


Thread (21 messages)

« previous php.dev (#59391) next »