Re: artificial constraints in php_mysql_get_field_name
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Wed, 18 Jul 2001 21:36:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: artificial constraints in php_mysql_get_field_name | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-60237@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
No good reason for that. When I wanted to change that, it was already too late in the game.
It'd probably make good sense to add a mysql_get_field_name_ex() which returns a more accurate value.
Zeev
At 00:37 19/07/2001, Cynic wrote:
Hi there, could anyone tell me what is the reasoning behind the constraints on the values returned by php_mysql_get_field_name()? I. e.: ...-- Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> CTO & co-founder, Zend Technologies Ltd. http://www.zend.com/1737 case FIELD_TYPE_SHORT: 1738 case FIELD_TYPE_LONG: 1739 case FIELD_TYPE_LONGLONG: 1740 case FIELD_TYPE_INT24: 1741 return "int"; 1742 break; 1743 case FIELD_TYPE_FLOAT: 1744 case FIELD_TYPE_DOUBLE: 1745 case FIELD_TYPE_DECIMAL: 1746 return "real"; 1747 break;... why doesn't it return "short", "longlong", "double" etc. i. e. the real value? This has been so since php_mysql.c v1.1 (2yrs, Zeev), so there must be a good reason behind this, but I just see it. anyone care to enlighten me? TIA cynic@mail.cz ------------- And the eyes of them both were opened and they saw that their files were world readable and writable, so they chmoded 600 their files.- Book of Installation chapt 3 sec 7