Re: Reworking DOMXML

From: Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:44:49 +0000
Subject: Re: Reworking DOMXML
References: 1  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-60281@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi Joey, Good to see some work going on with DOMXML =). On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Joey Smith wrote: > I think it is a good idea to keep both the "procedural" > and "object oriented" interfaces in the code. This should be kept, at least up until a new major PHP release occurs. > Style #1: > The dom_document object is always the FIRST parameter to > the function, if called as a procedure and NOT as a method > on a dom_document object. > > Pro: > This seems cleaner, as the user will ALWAYS know where > the object belongs. > > Con: > This might confuse the oop users, as the documentation does > not currently clearly distinguish the two interfaces. I am in favour of this style. Two reasons: it is a loose convention in development to have the first argument to a function/procedure be the object/variable the function/procedure is primarily concerned with. The second reason then stems from this: libxml always takes the xml doc pointer as the first argument. A difference between the two of them is bad form and could lead to confusing code. > Style #2: > The dom_document object is always LAST. > > Pros: > Simplest to implement with code as it currently stands. > Seems to be the way many other functions have been written. > > Cons: > User will have to remember all arguments of all functions and > pass SOMEthing, even if that means passing NULLs or something. Not necessarily. But in cases when you cannot easily identify which argument is which except by position, this will run against the conventional interfacing style of PHP. Gavin

« previous php.dev (#60281) next »