Re: Proposal
| From: | Ramsi Sras | Date: | Mon, 30 Jul 2001 08:04:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-61471@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
UNSUBSCRIBE ME PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Zeev Suraski schrieb:
> At 00:48 29/07/2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > > I'm against a global function like this, but in favour of the 2nd flavour,
> > > where you have to explicitly pass a list of variable names to import.
> >
> >Actually, I mostly had something like: import_globals("ES") in mind for
> >the import all variety. Importing all server and environment variables
> >when there are no external variables imported should not generate an
> >E_NOTICE.
>
> If we go down that route it's ok. I was talking about the
> import_globals("P") example, which in my opinion should not work, and
> import_globals("P", "*") which should work, but generate an E_NOTICE.
>
> >And jumping to 4.1 for only a config file change seems a bit odd.
>
> It looked odd to me as well, but after thinking about it for a while, it
> looks by far the most right thing to do:
> - There are no technical drawbacks whatsoever
> - It'll make much more noise than a 4.0.x, and make many more people
> realize the difference and do something about it, rather than just upgrade
> and do nothing.
> - We finally make use of a x.1 version :)
>
> I think that other than the psychological issue that we're not used to
> bumping the miniversion digit for almost anything, there's no reason not do
> it. If we end up having a semi-major version before 5.0 (which I doubt,
> considering the way things are going now), we can always release 4.2.
>
> Zeev
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net
> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net