zend_llist versus hash table
| From: | vrabel at burncd dot sk | Date: | Mon, 30 Jul 2001 09:21:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | zend_llist versus hash table | ||
| Groups: | php.dev | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-61514@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi folks.
I wrote the fancy template engine in php and now I am rewritting it as a
C module and want to main the both version. I look into the sources of the
php and understand a lot of thing, but have some questions.
I will have aproximately 30 items to store in some kind of array and I don't
know, which to use (in the look of the performance). Which is faster? The
zend_llist or hash table? I know that hash is good for a lot of items, but
I don't want to use cannon to shot the birds :)
Is any chance to include the template engine to the official distribution of
the php? I want to say, that is not the another dumb template engine.
its features:
* nested dynamic and optional blocks
* namespaces
* advanced caching (the parts of the template or the whole template)
Thanx anyway
peter vrabel