Re: Versioning (resent AGAIN due to lack of replies)
| From: | Stig Bakken | Date: | Sun, 16 Sep 2001 22:27:52 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Versioning (resent AGAIN due to lack of replies) | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-66071@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Stig Bakken wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Sander Steffann wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > PHP_VERSION_NUM
> >
> > +1 from me too.
> >
> > > Example:
> > > GD_EXT_VERSION = 30201
> >
> > Very big +1 on this one (or something similar). What also would be useful is
> > a built-in way to determine optional parts of extensions, like something to
> > check if GD supports GIF/PNG/etc. This way, you can check the version and
> > the optional parts.
>
> The PHP version is trivial to do, but what about extensions that are
> bundled today but that will be
(sorry for the interruption) ... de-bundled in the future. What version
scheme should they follow? Today using the PHP version could make sense,
but preparing for a de-bundled existence each extension should have its
own versioning scheme.
- Stig