Re: Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] namespaces ambiguity
| From: | (Stig Sæther Bakken) | Date: | Mon, 01 Oct 2001 10:41:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] namespaces ambiguity | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-66903@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Whoa. Once again I'm on that train of thought that eliminates the
difference between classes and namespaces. +1 from me.
- Stig
[Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>]
> :: is taken, but why not do it the C++ way? It also uses :: for both
> classes and namespaces.
>
> Zeev
>
> At 21:35 30-09-01, Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
> >[Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com>]
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > I just started playing around with the parser to support the
> > > namespaces syntax Stig laid out in his RFC. I think I've thought of an
> > > ambiguity (with constants) which makes me wonder how feasible the
> > > proposed syntax is.
> > > Consider the following expression:
> > > $test?FOO:BAR:BARBARA
> > >
> > > Would this mean that the person meant $test?(FOO):(BAR:BARBARA) or
> > > $test?(FOO:BAR):BARBARA?
> >
> >Okay, is there another character we can use? Doesn't look that way.
> >Maybe we need to use two characters then? Since both "::" and "->"
> >are taken, "//" is the best suggestion I can come up with.
> >
> > - Stig
> >
> >--
> > Stig Sæther Bakken <ssb@alltheweb.com>
> > Fast Search & Transfer ASA, Trondheim, Norway
>
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net
> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net
--
Stig Sæther Bakken <ssb@alltheweb.com>
Fast Search & Transfer ASA, Trondheim, Norway