RE: [PHP-DEV] CVS update: php3/functions

> > Well, now that you've changed the docs ... I gotta change the code back! > > Whoa. I think we should return a value between 1 and 366. That's what > date does, at least the GNU version that's on my machine. Wouldn't it be > better if we try to conform to a semi-standard? Or do other date utilities > do different things? I personally think so too. That's why I asked everyone else for their opinions, and then took the consensus and changed the code to match what the docs have been saying all along. The fact that no one noticed or complained or filed a bug report about the indiscrepency, probably shows that it's not a feature a lot of people are using, so I didn't think we'd be to amiss in changing the code and (technically speaking) making the next release "backwards incompatible". However, we would then be consistent with GNU date, some other versions, the original documentation, and just common-sense (IMHO). January first is day 1 of the year, not day 0. I really think this should be switched back to return 1-366. But, until we can *all* agree on something, I'm not going to touch it. Ah, the joys of CVS. ;) - Colin