Re: Followup to the Versioning Scheme discussion

Mainly the reason why it is needed. (This is propably the reason why so many developers have just ignored the discussion.) And also why it has to be very strict to really work. I guess I'm just thinking it other way around than others. :) --Jani On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: >I meant what you think people misunderstand. > >Andi > >At 02:13 AM 10/5/2001 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote: >>On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote: >> >> >At 04:04 PM 10/4/2001 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote: >> > >> >>No decisions were made since we haven't agreed on this yet. >> >>Some people seems to misunderstand this whole thing anyway. >> >> >> >>--Jani >> > >> >Can you please explain? >> >>Which part? :) >>I thought I explained it pretty well in the rfc. >>And if you meant the afreeing part, I don't think we >>have agreed upon anything yet? >> >>--Jani > > >