Re: ext/imagick update (fwd)

On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Sterling Hughes wrote: > > So imagemagick would be less popular than, say, Ovrimos, YAZ(eesh), > > SESAM, Crédit Mutuel CyberMUT... > > > no, I don't remember saying these belonged in PHP's CVS, > they are there for a large part imho legacy reasons and laziness > (ie, not enough bitching when they were proprosed). ok, I give up ;) You're right, if you say, that not sooo many extensions should be in the core php4 distribution. It makes the Release process somehow complicated... But unfortunately the pear-framework is at the moment not very sophisticated for handling traditional php-extension. But I will put some of my effort into that and hope the pear-folks will agree :) chregu