Re: php-patches@lists.php.net?
| From: | Yasuo Ohgaki | Date: | Wed, 05 Dec 2001 00:00:08 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: php-patches@lists.php.net? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-72529@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
James Moore wrote:
Anyone can sent, but reply for posted patch is not good. It think one of the reason is the volume of the mails.On Tue, 04 Dec 2001, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:04:29PM +0900, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:How about to have *new* list for sending patch for PHP? PostgreSQL has list for that. It seems the list is working great for them.php-dev is perfect for sending patches! tc
No, no. I suggest we split the list into extension specific lists. I claim php-pcre@lists.php.net and php-wddx@lists.php.net. Then we can have *really* focused discussion. This php-dev deal just waters everything down.
I agree.
Only if youll spend the time subscribing me to them all.. I really dont have time to subscribe myself to 40 somthing lists :)I don't want to subscribe 40 mailing lists, but I'm fine with 400 news groups. I guess many people prefer to subscribe mail instead of news. Anyway, someone should be resposible for patches. Patches are always ignored for a while (some of them are ignored for good, it seems) You know there developers *complains* about it. At least, patch sent to php-dev is *not* treated as nice as pgsql-patches. -- Yasuo Ohgaki