Re: [NEW EXTENSTION]: templates

Björn Schotte wrote: > * Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > > I don't see the need for the 230420000th template solution in or > > for PHP, the future belongs to XML and XSL(T) anyhow. > > Web designers and pixel movers are yet too dumb to > check how XSL(T) works. Ack. > So they prefer template > solutions like PHPLIB/IT[X], as Smarty is only usable > for programmers (and as Kris said, a template engine > should not be a full fledged turing engine). You have a point here, but you're not necessarily right. Smarty templates are more complex than IT[X]/PHPlib-style templates, but still easier than XSL, and not all designers are that dumb. I think IT[X]-style templates are more important, but I wouldn't object to having both. regards Wagner -- "Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence."