Re: Re: Shootout

From: Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 23:12:40 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: Shootout
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-75313@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
At 04:07 30/12/2001, August Zajonc wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Zeev Suraski" <zeev@zend.com> If you use caching software, chances are PHP will be faster than Perl even without the optimizer. Interestingly, Perl is getting bytecode caching soon, RFC 301 I think. Probably about time.
That RFC is from over a year ago, what makes you think it's going to happen soon..? It still remains to be seen if they do it in a nice, clean transparent way, or the Perl way :) Anyway, the other problems plaguing Perl still apply (having to worry about resources&memory).
What gets people riled up about these benchmarks is they see them as a whole picture slam against their favorite language, even if the benchmark is pretty clear about testing something pretty narrow which I think these are, they are remarkably honest for a benchmark.
Well, I think that benchmarking PHP like that out of any context is *bound* to result in many people getting the wrong ideas. So, a big disclaimer reading "This may not necessarily have any real world meaning" was due. Zeev

Thread (35 messages)

« previous php.dev (#75313) next »