Re: MOPS Benchmark
| From: | Sebastian Bergmann | Date: | Tue, 01 Jan 2002 15:59:50 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: MOPS Benchmark | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-75503@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I wouldn't pay too much attention to anything in version 0.0.3.
Of course.
> The Zend engine was quicker than Perl at this kind of stuff during
> initial stages of development, but as more features and
> functionality are added, it became slower.
I understand this, and somewhat expect Parrot to become slower. Apart
from that, I have a feeling that the fundamental difference of using a
register machine model for the virtual machine instead of the
''traditional'' stack machine approach will give Parrot -- and hence
Perl 6 -- a huge performance advantage.
> That said - if you're using PHP because of performance, you're
> choosing the wrong language. For instance, I can pretty much assure
> you that Microsoft's CLR is going to be quicker, because it'll be
> almost in the same speed of native code.
I chose PHP for its ease of use and its sex appeal.
I don't mind PHP to be slower than Perl or Python that much. But what
I would not mind would be the Zend Engine 2 beeing slower than the
Zend Engine 1...
BTW: Happy New Year :-)
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/