Re: consistent way to handle structs

I thought ZE2 was going to have support for method overloading? Marc Boeren wrote:

[fn(,,,,foo,,,,bar)]

I agree on that. You really don't know which parameters it was anymore. You don't have this problem with hashes. But I already see this thread won't get us anywhere :)

Well, I think everybody agrees that with hashes, functions are much easier to use... but that it is very inefficient. How about finding a new way to pass named parameters to a function? Like fn(foo2=$bar, foo=17); where fn accepts five parameters, in any order, but with 1 default order so you can use fn(17, $bar) as well (since foo, foo2 is the default order) (and the remaining arguments (3) are set to their default values. Cheerio, Marc.

-- Darrell Brogdon http://darrell.brogdon.net 1024D/D7FB6981 3CB8 A14D 1662 8351 11F6 40C1 D205 2D97 D7FB 6981