Re: overloading JNI return values

Quoting Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@php.net>: > I haven't looked at that part of the code, but David Sklar's idea about > using the mod_jserv protocol to talk to a persistent JVM seems like a good > place to start to me. I'm curious... this happened, and a persistant JVM was used, would this mean that we'd suddenly have a persistant resource accessible from any httpd process that would store objects that didn't need to be serialized()/unserialized() at every script invocation? I know it would only be for people using the JVM, and I don't know about memory usage, but it seems that could be huge win for people with complex session information to store... -chuck -- Charles Hagenbuch, <chagenbu@wso.williams.edu> -- "sleep comes from acorns." - jess