Re: Bug #3830 Updated: Function to timeout/break off a function

Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:

I agree. I'm not sure if this should be implemented as basic feature or not. IMO, timeout feature is better(easier) to implement function by function.

One more comment on this. Whoever implements general timeout feature, please consider about how resources/lib functions should be treated when timeout event occured. Process/thread is better to be alive and usable for next requests, but it's not possible probably ;) Question is do we really need general timeout feature that can timeout at any point of script execution? IMHO, tick function is enough and timeout should be implemented in function (or provide async function) -- Yasuo Ohgaki