Re: Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

I have set up dozens of production servers in the past couple of years and not a single one of them is running the static version. If there are issues with the DSO, then file a bug report on that so we can fix it. -Rasmus On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, August wrote: > Jim wrote: > >the fact that --with-apache does not work with apache 2.x is not a bug. > > I see the inability to compile a static version of php for apache as the > bug. Not too concerned with the semantics of the command. My experience > may be abnormal, but for production work, static compiles seem a must. > > I'll agree with Chand on this one, you'd think the performance hit would > only be on server startup, but there appear to be noticeable differences > beyond that. > > Someone should take a look at that DSO recommendation that's been > brought up a couple of times and add a note that for production stuff, > going static may be worth the extra compile time. > > - August > > > > > > > -- > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >