Re: New Module

From: Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 02:29:52 +0000
Subject: Re: New Module
References: 1  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-80774@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Well, so I'll try to port Crypto++ to my module, or make a new module out of it. First I'm adapting my php scripts to my new module. After that I'll begin to work on it, if anyone wants to join in, contact me. And where should I post my module to become public under PHP license in case anyone is interested?? regards, Keyser Soze ----- Original Message ----- From: <derick@php.net> To: "Joseph Tate" <jtate@mi-corporation.com> Cc: "Keyser Soze" <keysers@terra.com.br>; "Php-Dev List" <php-dev@lists.php.net> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:55 PM Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] New Module On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Joseph Tate wrote: > Well, J Smith has mentioned Crypto++. I haven't looked into it, but that > sounds like a good little module as a substitute for mcrypt. If he truly is > working on a php extension using it, then it's purely acedemic to add it to > your module. IMO, if there will be an interface to crypto++ it should be merged into the current mcrypt one, forming together a new combined module. (Just like Sterling is trying to do for XSLT). Derick > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Keyser Soze [mailto:keysers@terra.com.br] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:19 PM > > To: Joseph Tate; Brad Fisher; dark_panda@hushmail.com > > Cc: php-dev@lists.php.net > > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] New Module > > > > > > I agree, so I think this module could be packaged with a default mycrypt > > library to make this easier > > > > Any idea? > > > > Keyser Soz > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Joseph Tate" <jtate@mi-corporation.com> > > To: "Keyser Soze" <keysers@terra.com.br>; "Brad Fisher" > > <brad@info-link.net>; <dark_panda@hushmail.com> > > Cc: <php-dev@lists.php.net> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:15 PM > > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] New Module > > > > > > > What Brad is suggesting doesn't take away from your module, > > just makes it > > > easier to use from php land. No need to write your own crypt > > functions in > > > C, just write them in PHP and use them as callbacks. Of course leaving > > that > > > option for advanced users is a good idea. I personally don't > > think that I > > > would be writing custom crypt functions, so I would like a > > crypto++ plugin > > > to do that for me. > > > > > > Joseph > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Keyser Soze [mailto:keysers@terra.com.br] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:03 PM > > > > To: Brad Fisher; dark_panda@hushmail.com > > > > Cc: php-dev@lists.php.net > > > > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] New Module > > > > > > > > > > > > but that's what my module is meant for > > > > > > > > Keyser Soze > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Brad Fisher" <brad@info-link.net> > > > > To: <dark_panda@hushmail.com> > > > > Cc: <php-dev@lists.php.net> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:03 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] New Module > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > J Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I hesitate to mention this because I don't want to get stuck > > > > in a corner > > > > > > here, but I've been working on and off on a PHP encryption > > > > extension for > > > > > > precisely the reasons you mention. I'm using Crypto++, a > > public ... > > > > > > > > > > This sounds to me like one of the better ways to do it. > > Just have an > > > > extension > > > > > that does two-way encryption, and supports several different > > algorithms. > > > > For > > > > > those people who whant to define their own algorithms, why not > > > > have a way > > > > to > > > > > register a new crypt/decrypt callback methods either > > developed in PHP > > or > > > > > loadable module? Something like: > > > > > > > > > > bool crypto_register_algorithm(string name, function &crypt, > > function > > > > > &decrypt) > > > > > > > > > > Then crypt and decrypt could have function headers similar > > to (perhaps > > > > this is > > > > > oversimplified): > > > > > > > > > > string crypt(string data, mixed key) > > > > > > > > > > I don't think the module would need to write configuration > > files, etc. > > > > That > > > > > could be handled with PHP by the developer, or by another PHP > > > > > extension/function which can write such files. > > > > > > > > > > Just babbling, > > > > > -Brad > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > PHP Development Mailing List > > > > > <http://www.php.net/> > > > > > To unsubscribe, visit: > > > > > http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > PHP Development Mailing List > > > > <http://www.php.net/> > > > > To unsubscribe, visit: > > > > http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > > > > -- > > > PHP Development Mailing List > > > <http://www.php.net/> > > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > > > > -- > > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > -- > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >

« previous php.dev (#80774) next »