Re: 1 byte overflow in wordwrap

On 18/03/02, "Jim Winstead" <jimw@apache.org> wrote: > Wez Furlong <wez@thebrainroom.com> wrote: > > I'll see if I can force it to happen in isolation. > are you passing a fourth parameter to wordwrap? Yes; it's always 0. > the easiest way to track it down would be to insert some debugging > statements in the wordwrap() function to print out the text being > wrapped, the newtextlen that gets calculated, and then value of > newtextlen at the end of the function. It's quite a rare occurrence; I've only seen it twice in two days, and I'd estimate that wordwrap gets called around 250-300 times per day. I'll see if I get time to reproduce it tonight; I've some things to do with the streams first. > (this code is all new since 4.1.x, so this particular bug likely does > not exist in those versions. the old implementation has an entirely > different set of bugs. :) Ah. :-) --Wez.