Re: RFC: README.SUBMITTING_PATCH (2nd edition)
| From: | derick@php.net | Date: | Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:03:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: README.SUBMITTING_PATCH (2nd edition) | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-81446@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 12:03:50PM -0500, James E. Flemer wrote :
> > What about in-line vs. attachments? For patching,
> > attachments are probably easier, but for reviewing I find
> > it useful if the patch is in-line.
> >
>
> -1 ...
>
> If the patch is not inline you will have hard time extracting
> it.
A patch in an attachemtn is more convenient, just save and patch, while
inline patches need copying/pasting and or cutting.
Derick
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PHP: Scripting the Web - derick@php.net
All your branches are belong to me!
SRM: Script Running Machine - www.vl-srm.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------------