Re: Proposed new mail function "mailfx()"

Markus Fischer wrote: > > Current mail() implementation already has fifth optional > argument which does exactly what you want. > > And, for the 'file', it's as easy as writing: > > mail('To', 'Subject', > join('',file('filename')), ... > > not that hard ... > > I don't think another mail*() function whith no significat > enhancements is a good idea. > > - Markus Okay. In the books and as of the last time I checked the online doc, there was no 5th parameter. Since that's the primary purpose of the new function, and since the input of a file versus a string is trivial, scratch the new function. -ecsd