Re: Re: Re: Session patch
| From: | Stig S. Bakken | Date: | Sat, 30 Mar 2002 11:21:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Re: Session patch | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-81950@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
What has that got to do with anything?
- Stig
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 20:11, Egon Schmid wrote:
> No, I don´t read such nonsense patents.
>
> -Egon
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stefan Esser" <s.esser@e-matters.de>
> To: <php-dev@lists.php.net>
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 7:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Re: Session patch
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have not followed the discussion, but its nonsense to force
> people to use
> > PHP generated session IDs. Its an argument against using PHP.
> > There are several situations where it is not possible to let PHP
> generate
> > the session ids. Especially if you use stuff like the Sevenval FIT
> or HIT
> > technology which makes use of hostnames to contain the session
> ids.
> > Stuff like this is needed to track f.e. shockwave or flash
> content.
> >
> > Stefan
> >
> > --
> > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php