RE: [PHP-DEV] codenames (Was:Preview version of Zend Engine 2 powered
| From: | php4 at developersdesk dot com | Date: | Sun, 31 Mar 2002 17:26:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] codenames (Was:Preview version of Zend Engine 2 powered | ||
| Groups: | php.dev | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-81990@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
** Reply to note from derick@php.net Sun, 31 Mar 2002 13:06:11 +0200 (CEST)
>
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 php4@developersdesk.com wrote:
>
> > > > Codenames are cool, but using our own names is no-so-cool. We should
> > > > pick a theme though, but please not Australian wildlife (we're already
> > > > using that for the alltheweb.com frontend ;-).
> >
> > -1 on code names at all.
> >
> > What came first woody or potatoe? You can't tell from the name. There
> > is no doubt 4.2.0 is newer than 4.1.6. Why introduce unneeded
> > ambiguity for those who don't follow PHP closely.
>
> Oh come on... some people just don't have any sense of humur at all.
> Of couurse we wouldn't remove the version numbers altogether.
That's fine as long as version numbers get mentioned along with the
code name. Every reference to Debian I see talks about just the code
name which doesn't mean a thing to me. I've lost all interest in
Debian because of it.
Rick
Rick Widmer
Internet Marketing Specialists
http://www.developersdesk.com