Re: Re: aggregate() und overload()

I think that the key problems are: (a) It's unclear if the current behavior is the 'right thing' to do, as demonstrated by Kristian and yourself... (b) I personally think that it pretty much set the final decision on MI (as in, there won't be MI), because having both aggregation and MI in a language is kind of clumsy and messy. That's not much of a big deal I guess, but people should realize that. Zeev At 12:07 PM 4/5/2002, Stig S. Bakken wrote:

On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 11:05, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote: Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:

--disable-experimental-aggregate and --disable-experimental-overload? Just in case we really want to make it optional and have new way for overloading/multiple inheritance. We can document these features as EXPETIMENTAL as long as we want, right?

which brings us back to the discussion that EXPERIMENTAL stuff should not be packed into releases or should at least be disabled by default (like linux configuration does with its "enable experomental stuff" which is disabled by default) If these features are going to be marked as experimental because they have not been accepted by php-dev, php-dev should at least make an effort to comment on them so we can resolve this. I don't want to have overload and aggregate lingering as experimental features. If people have objections, bring them on so we can talk. - Stig -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php