Re: Proposal for aggregation vs. MI

At 23:11 10/04/2002 +0300, Andi Gutmans wrote:

At 13:07 10/04/2002 -0700, brad lafountain wrote: I was thinking that we could have an explicit way of calling the right

one. hmm what would this look like? $a->c::print(); i guess that's not that bad. and its kinda consistant but i do like $a->c->print(); too..

Last but not least :) We could always place the aggregated classes as properties of the aggregating class with the same name. So $a->c->print() would automatically work. The only difference between this and regular aggregates is that the object would know it should relay method calls to them. Andi