Re: Re: Bug #17022: enhance socket_strerror(errno) tomake errno optional

I think he is referring to persistent sockets. Tom, Could you outline how you would use a persistent sockets, and why it would benefit you? -Jason On Mon, 2002-05-06 at 10:54, Markus Fischer wrote: > Hi, > > What do you mean with psocket() ? > > - Markus > > On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 09:39:23AM -0700, Tom Robinson wrote : > > I see you are right. Whereas although socket_last_error() (no argument) can be viewed as a > > shortcut, it is actually a feature that cannot be duplicated in user space because of the situation > > when socket_connect fails. > > Next... how about psocket? > > ...Tom > > >This really is something that better belongs in user-space. > > > > -- > Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. > GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc > "I'm not stupid, you know? :)" - Jani Taskinen