Re: PECL vs. CORE .... was msession
| From: | Dan Kalowsky | Date: | Sat, 25 May 2002 05:09:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PECL vs. CORE .... was msession | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-84448@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> exceptions would be made for 'major' technologies like ODBC and COM, and
> those extensions required to install other extensions (zlib, xmlrpc,
> etc.). Binary distributions would contain certain extensions from PECL,
> for example the win32api extension, which realy shouldn't be in the
> primary distribution, but should be in the win32 binary distribution.
Actually Shane I would argue that ODBC and COM specifically should be
moved the PECL. Not for the whole be my own boss idea, but mainly for the
"we can release when needed" phenom. I.E. ODBC is only v2 compiliant,
I've been working on upgrading it to 3.7... it would be nice to do small
increments or something (god it will be nice to remove the TEXT bug
reports).
>---------------------------------------------------------------<
Dan Kalowsky "The record shows, I took the blows.
http://www.deadmime.org/~dank And did it my way."
dank@nospam-deadmime.org - "My Way", Frank Sinatra
kalowsky@nospam-php.net