Re: PHP web farms (i.e. why msession or something like it)

On Sat, 25 May 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote: > At 10:20 25/05/2002 -0400, mlwmohawk@mohawksoft.com wrote: [...] > >Obviously I think msession is pretty good, but SRM works too. Regardless of > >which, or even either, PHP needs to make an ?enterprise? statement. That's indeed true. There is some discussion on the php-evang(elism) mailing list, but it needs to mature a little bit. > >Marginalizing this capability IMHO is not the right direction, I think there > >should, in fact, be a stronger push for this sort of capability to be > >built in by default. Agree with that too... but if something like this should be mainstream, all components should in be in the PHP source tree, including the daemon. > I agree. I also think that a solution like msession should be pushed > despite the work on SRM because many PHP programmers will not want to go in > the SRM direction but will want a plug-and-play solution for the most > common PHP 2-tier Apache <-> DB solution. msession is more more specialized for 'sessions' and thus far better for it than SRM, which is a different thing. Derick --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PHP: Scripting the Web - derick@php.net All your branches are belong to me! SRM: Script Running Machine - www.vl-srm.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------------