Re: Re: Performance of Apache 2.0 Filter

At 18:53 6-6-2002, Cliff Woolley shared with all of us:

On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: A user posted [1] a "benchmark" today in the German PHP Newsgroup [2] stating that Apache 2.0 and PHP (current HEAD) are about 20% slower than Apache 1.3. Are there any official benchmarks out there? I can't quite believe this... None that I know of. But I'm not terribly surprised by this... Apache 2.0 itself tends to be a bit faster than 1.3 depending on the configuration,

Actually - depending on the platform also: Apache 1.3.24 - 50 childs: ================================================= Document Path:/manual/mod/directives.html Document Length:17138 bytes Concurrency Level:40 Time taken for tests:484.882 seconds Complete requests:200000 Failed requests:0 Total transferred:-789454894 bytes HTML transferred:-867257617 bytes Requests per second:412.47 Transfer rate:-1628.14 kb/s received Connnection Times (ms) min avg max Connect: 0 0 1752 Processing: 3 96 5433 Total: 3 96 7185 Apache 2.0.36 - per-thread, 3 childs, 50/per child ================================================== Document Path:/manual/mod/directives.html Document Length:17999 bytes Concurrency Level:40 Time taken for tests:2340.058 seconds Complete requests:200000 Failed requests:0 Total transferred:-640847172 bytes HTML transferred:-694857432 bytes Requests per second:85.47 Transfer rate:-273.86 kb/s received Connnection Times (ms) min avg max Connect: 0 2 1999 Processing: 11 465 4612 Total: 11 467 6611 ab -w -n 200000 -c 40 <url> Ap2 didn't have php compiled. Apache 1.3.24 did. but - I believe this to be a thread/DSO/signals issue. Would be interesting to see, if Debian has the same problems, as most answers, to problems on BSD/OS I've got from Debian postings :-) Not to mention: http://bugs.php.net/?id=17614 http://bugs.php.net/?id=17575 Met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards, IDG.nl Melvyn Sopacua Webmaster