Re: Re: [rfc] apache_hooks update (yet incomplete)

I wasn't proposing putting it in HEAD, just that the work was done against HEAD not against your apache_hooks. Lukas redid all the php<->apache request object work fresh off of head, and I made changes off of that, so it contains nothing from your apache_hooks branch. Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:

I think if we put this in 4.3 we are going to delay 4.3 even further. Although, I suppose if we are careful and make sure we #ifdef it nicely and only turn it on with a configure option, we can put it in HEAD. So, is your patch my apache_hooks stuff + Lukas's work and then your stuff on top? On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, George Schlossnagle wrote:

All of this work was off HEAD. Should a new_apache_hooks branch be tagged? Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:

I say commit it. This stuff is very experimental as it is and lives in its own branch. You are not going to destabilize anything. (I just made sure you had enough karma for the commit) -Rasmus