Re: Re: output buffering
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Tue, 08 Oct 2002 08:57:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: output buffering | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-89205@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I think we have a bit of a language gap, which is fine, but let's settle for that:
Please make sure that if you have a small doubt regarding a certain behavior, especially in a core component of PHP such as the output buffering layer or the session module - you ask the relevant author(s) about it, CCing php-dev. Worst case - you'll ask a bit more than necessary, but that's much better than not asking enough.
Let's look forward now...
Zeev
At 03:32 08/10/2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Zeev Suraski wrote:Really? Yasuo, people have been requesting that we disable your write access to the full php4 tree, and uptil now I was against it. But this attitude is making me reconsider my stand on this. This is the 2nd time in the last couple of days that I notice that your unverified assumptions introduced inconsistencies/bugs/misbehaviors, and if you don't realize that it needs to be fixed, we have a bit of a problem here. Please reconsider.Zeev, I think you know my attitude. I usually ask when it's not clear bug or simple bug. I'm write if I'm not sure which Sascha said people don't read code shouldn't comment. I agree and I usually follow this basic rule. There is misunderstanding that I thought you were willing to have flushing while you are not. This resulted that mess we had. I think it has been resolved, isn't it?This line should be read No. I don't think I need to ask if it is problem or not. It is problem which I'm not willing to be fixed. It does not work as it is supposed in limited case. We have options, leave code and document limitation, modify code to resolve small issue or just ignore it. Flushing is problematic and we know well :) -- Yasuo OhgakiNo. I don't think I need to ask.