Re: Proposal for naming tests

On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > At 11:57 25-10-2002, Derick Rethans wrote: [snip] > > >I do not see a real use to rename tests, but IMO this is the way to go > >for newly written tests. Of course renaming tests is ok too if you like > >to do that :) > > There's one drawback. Extensions with names after 'b' get evaluated after > the bug tests. > This is currently not a problem, but I've been playing with the thought to > introduce 'skip_ext' to speed things up: > --SKIP-- > <?php if(!extension_loaded('dba3')) { die("skip_ext this extension is not > available"); } ?> > > But of course you can just tell me to stop playing with the tought :) Hereby I tell you to stop playing with that thought :P No, serious... I don't think we really need this, and is speed really that important? (The whole suite runs in under a minute here with about 75% of the extensions). Derick -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/ JDI Media Solutions --------------[ if you hold a unix shell to your ear, do you hear the c? ]-