Re: Extending DB2 odbc support
| From: | Dan Kalowsky | Date: | Sat, 09 Nov 2002 04:44:21 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Extending DB2 odbc support | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-90690@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Friday, November 8, 2002, at 08:34 PM, tim wrote:
If I take the existing php odbc code and add the ibm-db2 specific extensions, what are the chances of this making it into the main php distribution as a new extension ( ext/ibmdb2 ) ? Is it a good idea to maintain a separate cvs tree on sf.net so it gets some testing first?I cannot comment directly on the creation of ext/ibmdb2, although I'd rather see something like that moved to PECL (where everything will be eventually). As for separate CVS trees, while it sounds like a good idea, it's my opinion that it's not a good thing. If you can detail/outline the changes you want to make a bit more it might help in the discussion. Right now there is another user extending ODBC to better support IBM DB2 systems.
I am looking to create something similar to oracle's php extension.What would be the advantages of doing this? What sort of extra functionality is there that implementing such a system will provide to DB2 systems? I'm just trying to get a feel for what you're reasonings, and level of implementation will be.
---------------------------------------------------------------<Dan Kalowsky "A little less conversation,
http://www.deadmime.org/~dank a little more action." dank-nom@aps-deadmime.org - "A Little Less Conversation", kalowsky@php.net Elvis Presley