Re: Bug #20460 (Feature Request)
| From: | Moriyoshi Koizumi | Date: | Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:42:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Bug #20460 (Feature Request) | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-91835@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Sterling Hughes <sterling@bumblebury.com> wrote:
> > > err. it didn't need a reimplementation, i fixed it, it works fine in cvs.
> >
> > Then,
> >
> > <?php
> > $buf = "123 456 \0 567"
> > sscanf($buf, "%d%d%s%d", $a, $b, $c, $d);
> > var_dump($a, $b, $c, $d);
> > ?>
> >
> > How about this?
> >
> > The result was the same as for fscanf.
> >
>
> Yes, but it didn't need a reimplementation as far as using arbitrary buffer
> sizes.
Right, I just missed a big point about the scanf behaviour :)
Moriyoshi
> -Sterling