Re: [PATCH] New changes to ext_skel for C++

As others have pointed out, it is, but I think it would be better to simply have the code there in the generated C++ source and not at all in the C source. It would lead to less confusion imho. I guess it should kind of be assumed that if someone is going the distance to actually create an extension to PHP, they're probably going to know what __cplusplus, extern "C" and all that stuff means, but on the other hand, I've seen (and received) some pretty ridiculous questions on that sort of stuff dealing with PHP extensions directly. J Stig S. Bakken wrote: > Isn't __cplusplus defined for all C++ compilers? > > #ifdef __cplusplus > extern "C" { > #endif > > #ifdef __cplusplus > } > #endif > > This is pretty common in library header files at least. > > - Stig >