Re: [Mono-list] PHP# - feasibility study so far - for comment

From: Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:24:26 +0000
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] PHP# - feasibility study so far - for comment
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-92497@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Angel "Java" Lopez wrote: > I think that we can implement something like PHPValue, and then subclass: > PHPString, PHPInteger, PHPReal, PHPArray, PHPObject and PHPReference, to > manage dynamically the php values.... The basic operators (like . the > concatenate operator), can be implemented like methods, one version for each > class... Yup, exactly my idea. > The PHP objects are "associative-array-like" objects, and can be > created on the fly (an example: mysql_fetch_object) without a predefined > class. Of course, the objects needs a method-table.... > > But, the PHP#, is an interpreter? From what I know it would compile down to CIL, so it's not interpreted anymore then. (well, not required to) Derick -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/ PHP Magazine - PHP Magazine for Professionals http://php-mag.net/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------

« previous php.dev (#92497) next »