Re: [Mono-list] PHP# - feasibility study so far - for comment
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:24:26 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [Mono-list] PHP# - feasibility study so far - for comment | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-92497@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Angel "Java" Lopez wrote:
> I think that we can implement something like PHPValue, and then subclass:
> PHPString, PHPInteger, PHPReal, PHPArray, PHPObject and PHPReference, to
> manage dynamically the php values.... The basic operators (like . the
> concatenate operator), can be implemented like methods, one version for each
> class...
Yup, exactly my idea.
> The PHP objects are "associative-array-like" objects, and can be
> created on the fly (an example: mysql_fetch_object) without a predefined
> class. Of course, the objects needs a method-table....
>
> But, the PHP#, is an interpreter?
From what I know it would compile down to CIL, so it's not interpreted
anymore then. (well, not required to)
Derick
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/
PHP Magazine - PHP Magazine for Professionals http://php-mag.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------