RE: [PHP-DEV] php-cgi vs php-cli naming issue
| From: | Sebastian Nohn | Date: | Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:30:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] php-cgi vs php-cli naming issue | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-92499@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derick Rethans [mailto:derick@php.net]
> Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 7:21 PM
> To: marcus.boerger@post.rwth-aachen.de
> Cc: john@coggeshall.org; 'Stig S. Bakken'; 'Sterling Hughes'; 'Andrei
> Zmievski'; php-dev@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] php-cgi vs php-cli naming issue
>
>
> On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
>
> > At 18:33 15.12.2002, John Coggeshall wrote:
> > > >I see that renaming the CGI to php-cgi might break things indeed, and
> > > >that's never a good idea. But so is changing the name of the
> CLI (php)
> > > >to something else. It also breaks things, not only for me, but
> > > >also for
> > > >countless others using the CLI with the name 'php'. We also need to
> > > >think about these users as well. This leaves my opinion that
> i'm -1 on
> > > >renaming the CLI to something else, and i'm a -0 (yes this
> > > >changed :) on
> > > >renaming the CGI. This leaves the (IMO) only possible solution:
> > > >integrate them back into one binary and adding some magic
> > > >which triggers
> > > >CLI or CGI mode (perhaps to check for some environment variable).
> > >
> > >I'm a bit nervous about the checking of an environment variable thing.
> > >Is that platform/server independent?
> >
> > No, CGI is a well described standard. The only problem there is when
> > someone experiments with the combined executable as a CGI with
> > setting such vars and then forgets to remove the vars after testing is
> > done. In this case he has changed the behaviour of his CLI executable.
>
> By environment variables I meant thing that get set for the CGI
> itnerface. From http://hoohoo.ncsa.uiuc.edu/cgi/env.html you
> can read
> that the GATEWAY_INTERFACE is available for all requests, so it's safe
> to test if this one exists.
>
> > So i am against comining them back. Besides that i fear that we would
> > have to restart release cycle...
>
> The release cycle would be a problem indeed...
Why do we need new releases every couple of weeks? Don't misunderstand me, I
would really like to see 4.3 released, as this is the first version since
around one year that will have only a few bugs on Tru64, on the other hand
I'm really shocked, how buggy 4.3 will be on windows
(http://lists.php.net/article.php?group=php.qa&article=7279). I do not
develop on windows, so I have no idea if PHP always was so buggy on windows,
but in my eyes 4.3 is far from being ready to be released if you take the
windows-versions.
Regards,
Sebastian Nohn
--
sebastian@nohn.net - http://www.nohn.net/
PGP Key Available - Did I help you? Consider a gift:
http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/wishlist/3HYH6NR8ZI0WI/