Re: What headers/libs does Win32 Snaps build use?
| From: | Steph | Date: | Wed, 08 Jan 2003 01:25:29 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: What headers/libs does Win32 Snaps build use? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-93249@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> The solution for this would be to create and maintain HOW-TO files for
all
> the extensions requireing an external library.
>
> Many if these libs. can be downloaded and build from source files.
Only a
> few requires commercial libraries.
This would also solve the problem Edin and I briefly discussed on irc
(of different versions of the same library being available and
supported)
I'd be happy to do some work on this.
>
> - Frank
>
> > Yes, Steph is right, the set of libraries used on the snaps machine
is
> ~70MB
> > (uncompressed) and I don't think it's practical to update
win32build.zip
> to
> > include them all. And this 70 MB does not include files needed for
> building
> > ext/infromix, ext/interbase and sapi/pi3web.
> >
> > Edin
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steph" <sfox@php.net>
> > To: "Christoph Grottolo" <cg@gordimer.net>; "Michael Sisolak"
> > <msisolak@yahoo.com>
> > Cc: "PHP DEV" <php-dev@lists.php.net>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 8:44 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] What headers/libs does Win32 Snaps build use?
> >
> >
> > > There are a lot of them - that's likely to be the biggest issue.
> Nearly
> > > 20 megs of libraries (and this from some months ago).
> > >
> > > This is really Edin's territory...
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Christoph Grottolo" <cg@gordimer.net>
> > > To: <php-dev@lists.php.net>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 7:31 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] What headers/libs does Win32 Snaps build
use?
> > >
> > >
> > > > > Basically what I'm talking about is updating win32build.zip so
> that
> > > it
> > > > > has all the current libraries that are really used to do a PHP
> build
> > > > > on Win32. Is there a practical or licensing reason why that
> > > couldn't
> > > > > be done? Would it be a lot more work than just packaging up a
> few
> > > > > directories on the snaps machine?
> > > > >
> > > > > Michael Sisolak
> > > >
> > > > +1 on this - if my vote counts
> > > >
> > > > Christoph