Re: Reducing the number of system calls for includes

> > That said, we could possibly have a fast mode and use fstat() to get some > > device information on the open file. I am worried about functionality > > though. I'm not sure it's worth breaking. > > The question here is whether it's worthwhile to optimize for > the case where you have 30+ includes per page. Is it that > common? Yes, I'm as a PHP-developer (developing _with_ PHP :-), I can say, my site has a well-organized dir-structure, I uses a _lot_ of includes, in some requests, it's over 30 (it's depends on the request, because i use a main script as a wrapper for other scripts..) > I think that sites where this actually matters should employ > some form of preprocessing for their scripts where > include/require directives get interpolated by the contents > of the respective file. This can be easily implemented > either in about 50 LOC of PHP or sh/awk. That won't work of > course, if you rely heavily on dynamic includes where the > filename is determined at run-time. WKO preprocessing do you think? Miham. -- ************************************************************* * Miham KEREKES * Szegedi Tudományegyetem Egyetemi Könyvtár * *****************[ miham@bibl.u-szeged.hu ]****************** * Aki mindig a sátor tetején van, annak a sátoraljaújhely.. *