Re: a translations update
| From: | Philip Olson | Date: | Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:31:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: a translations update | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.doc php.doc.ar php.doc.bg php.doc.cs php.doc.da php.doc.de php.doc.es php.doc.el php.doc.fi php.doc.fr php.doc.he php.doc.hk php.doc.hu php.doc.id php.doc.it php.doc.ja php.doc.kr php.doc.lt php.doc.nl php.doc.pl php.doc.pt php.doc.pt-br php.doc.ro php.doc.ru php.doc.sk php.doc.sl php.doc.sv php.doc.tr php.doc.tw php.doc.zh php.doc.ca php.doc.no |
| Request: | Send a blank email to doc-ar+get-726@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 28 Mar 2008, at 13:36, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Philip Olson <philip@roshambo.org> wrote:Perhaps, but it's nice to have something more permanent.This page is for both users of the PHP Manual as well as translators. Yes, people do care. It is to explain why [suddenly] 2/3 of the translations seemingly disappeared, and also offers yet another path for people to find themselves helping the PHP project. Writing such a page is worth it, doesn't hurt, I'll write it.Or just write up a news entry for it? Safes us a lot of hassle imo.
Yep, how does this sound to everyone? Regards, PhilipI proposed 11 translations for us to have online, whereas the rest go offline. Doing so means weekly builds again, starting a week from now.[...]The idea is to focus on getting those 11 online this week, then only those 11 will be online via phpweb. Whether the others build or not does not affect this. Earlier when you wrote that translations should go online as soon as they build, I expressed my view that whether something builds should not be the factor there.OK. As of next Friday, April 4th, we build all translations weekly. All but those 11 languages will be thrown into the $INACTIVE_ONLINE_LANGUAGES array on phpweb (i.e. does not show up on php.net/docs nor the "view this page in", and a user won't be redirected there based on his ACCEPT_LANGUAGE headers). Am I understanding you correctly?