Doc #68364 [Opn->Nab]: Missing reserved keyword 'self'
| From: | bwoebi@php.net | Date: | Thu, 06 Nov 2014 13:45:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | Doc #68364 [Opn->Nab]: Missing reserved keyword 'self' | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.doc.bugs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to doc-bugs+get-11610@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=68364&edit=1
ID: 68364
Updated by: bwoebi@php.net
Reported by: nanne at huiges dot nl
Summary: Missing reserved keyword 'self'
-Status: Open
+Status: Not a bug
Type: Documentation Problem
Package: Documentation problem
Operating System: Irrelevant
PHP Version: Irrelevant
Block user comment: N
Private report: N
New Comment:
No, self (and parent) aren't keywords. You can declare a
function self() {} without problems. They're just forbidden to use in class contexts for
resolving any ambiguity about what self:: and parent:: should address. The class itself/parent of
the class or the classes self/parent?
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2014-11-06 12:46:40] nanne at huiges dot nl
Description:
------------
---
From manual page: http://www.php.net/reserved.keywords
---
The keyword 'self' is not featured in the list of reserved keywords, but it should be.
Test script:
---------------
<?php
class self{
}
Expected result:
----------------
The result "implied" by the manual is that this would work.
(Not that I say the actual _expected_ result is empty by the way, this is obviously not a bug in
code, but a bug in the manual). so you could say the expected 'result' is that it is in
the manual :)
Actual result:
--------------
The correct
PHP Fatal error: Cannot use 'self' as class name as it is reserved in test.php on line 3
is provided, even though it isn't in the documentation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=68364&edit=1