Doc #55830 [Wfx]: (minor) contant order
| From: | moosh@php.net | Date: | Sat, 08 Oct 2011 21:38:22 +0000 |
| Subject: | Doc #55830 [Wfx]: (minor) contant order | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.doc.bugs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to doc-bugs+get-7305@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55830&edit=1
ID: 55830
Updated by: moosh@php.net
Reported by: moosh@php.net
Summary: (minor) contant order
Status: Wont fix
Type: Documentation Problem
Package: Documentation problem
PHP Version: Irrelevant
Assigned To: frozenfire
Block user comment: N
Private report: N
New Comment:
@frozenfire I agree, but perhaps explain it in top of list ?
How I discover it. I was searching "REQUEST_TIME" to confirm it exists, I Found
REQUEST_URI, and REQUEST_TIME was not near REQUEST_URI. So in a first time I thought be on a wrong
way. It's only later I saw it upper in the list.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-10-08 21:30:52] frozenfire@php.net
At first, I was inclined to agree with you. Then, after some thinking, it
occurred to me that the indices are currently grouped based upon the function
they relate to.
The current ordering is sensible, so I won't change it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-10-02 09:57:56] moosh@php.net
Description:
------------
---
From manual page: http://www.php.net/reserved.variables.server#refsect1-reserved.variables.server-indices
---
What's the order of server indices ?
Why not alphabetical order ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55830&edit=1