Re: speed test data

> --------------------------------------- > FuncFancy: > first display: 120 - 170 > subsequent refreshes: 40 - 60 > > FuncBare: > fisrt: 70 - 130 > sub : 30 - 50 > > InnerBare: > first: 60 - 110 > sub : 20 - 40 > > InnerFancy: > first: 150 - 200 > sub: ~100 OK, I made the test for these HTML files with external JS files, as opposed to internal JS code as presented by Brendan. The results are very interesting. It seems, that the Func* pages display with the same time values, while InnerFancy works on double speed both for the first display and subsequent displays. InnerBare works on the lowest margin presented above, and never prints time number values for the first time bigger than 70 :) Though these test files are not complete in the sense, that these are only using the funcs and innerhtml tricks to display the header and footer, the comparisions would be fairly the same if we would make scripts work for all parts. So as the numbers show, on my testmachine, the winner is InnerHTML, with Brendan's test using external JS codes. BTW, I have updated the http://weblabor.hu/php/speed.zip so now the external JS files are also included. See for yourself, if my results are the same for you. Goba