Re: svn: /phpdoc/en/trunk/reference/taint/ book.xml

I think we used to have this convention but I agree that we doesn't need to stick it anymore. It just fixes highlighting in my editor so if I am touching some file then I usually add it. Jakub Vrána

On 26 January 2013 01:08, Jakub Vrana<vrana@php.net> wrote:

vrana                                    Sat, 26 Jan 2013 01:08:47 +0000

Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=329303 Log: Spacing, trailing ?> Changed paths:

     U   phpdoc/en/trunk/reference/taint/book.xml

Modified: phpdoc/en/trunk/reference/taint/book.xml ===================================================================

--- phpdoc/en/trunk/reference/taint/book.xml    2013-01-26 00:34:34 UTC (rev 329302)
+++ phpdoc/en/trunk/reference/taint/book.xml    2013-01-26 01:08:47 UTC (rev 329303)

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@

     inject, etc.
    </para>
    <para>

- When taint is enabled, if you pass a tainted string(comes from $_GET, + When taint is enabled, if you pass a tainted string (comes from $_GET,

     $_POST or $_COOKIE) to some functions, taint will warn you about that.
    </para>
    <example>

@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ include($file_name); mysql_query($sql); +?> ]]>

     </programlisting>
     &example.outputs.similar;

Should all the examples have a closing ?> ? Not essential and in some cases not wanted by various coding standards.