Re: Note about translating type names

From: Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:13:45 +0000
Subject: Re: Note about translating type names
References: 1 2  Groups: php.doc.ru 
Request: Send a blank email to doc-ru+get-211@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I do agree with you guys. Since my position at the office has been raised, I've got a lot of additional work to do. Thus, unfortunately, I can't participate in translation until I have a little more free time. I hope you do (and you do, as I can see) your best without my temporary absence. "Antony Dovgal" <tony2001@phpclub.net> ÓÏÏÂÝÉÌ/ÓÏÏÂÝÉÌÁ × ÎÏ×ÏÓÔÑÈ ÓÌÅÄÕÀÝÅÅ: news:20040211185931.19bc186e.tony2001@phpclub.net... > On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:53:46 +0300 > "Kai" <veingrou@mail.ru> wrote: > > > Also I think that we shouldn't translate type names in function reference. > > There is several arguments for that: > > - When you do type casting you using '(integer)', '(array)' and so on. Not > > '(ÃÅÌÏÅ)' or '(ÍÁÓÓÉ×)'. > > Absolutely agree. > lovchy has already changed this in mysql_* translation. > > > So it seems to be that tronic is only who whants to translate them ;) > > Typenames definitely should be left alone, he should agree with the majourity =) > > --- > WBR, > Antony Dovgal aka tony2001 > tony2001@phpclub.net

« previous php.doc.ru (#211) next »