Re: pepr enhancements

On Monday 06 September 2004 13:04, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > Hi, > > Now may I return to the question that our pepr variant is capable of > handling easy ports of the pepr updates, or not? I have just found out > that pepr got some cool new features, and it would be definitely a bad > idea to keep our port on a different track. I was just going to mail the list about this :) The RFC System can be patched, but it includes custom code and fixes... When I aplly a patch I always do it by hand, line numbers don't match and files have been renamed... > > http://www.schlitt.info/applications/blog/index.php?/archives/252_PEPr_enhancements.html the changes include this: - Replaced the drop-down box, for filtering proposals by status, with the new nice looking tab navigation. Already done. - Cut down the number of finished proposals displayed on the overview page to 10. Aslo done. - Nicer sorting for the status filter pages. Also done. - Searching PEPr proposals (select "PEPr proposals" from the search dropdown). Pear has a search box and page, just like php.net. Shouild docweb include such a quick search or just a search.php with a link on (every?) page? - RSS feeds for the 10 most recent proposals and the 10 most per status. - RSS search for PEPr proposals. This will require atleast something to generate the rss feeds. Pear uses Damblan, which is a special pear website package, and works nice.. But do we really want to use it? Making sure PEPr is up to date is nice, but doo we want to use all the pear stuff.. I'm not sure, but it could be that Damblan require most files to work... Please let me know if something didn't made sense, I'm still a bit ill :( - Vincent > > Goba >